Originally posted June 14, 2012 at 5:00 AM as a gift to you from Professor Mentu
The following is an actual conversation pulled from Facebook which occurred after a chick friend of mine posted this UMan article. I’ve deleted most of the OP’s comments, because they were primarily in support of UMan; not necessarily the post itself, but rather my right to have an opinion in general. The other 6 Hamster’s comments are unedited, except where personal information had to be removed.
Due to the seemingly unending inane banter, I’m going to post this long-ass exchange in a series of episodes. I could barely read through all of it, and I don’t want to subject you to too much chick bullshit. As further episodes are published, you can click on the “Cliterati” tag at the bottom of the article to catch up on past posts if you’d like.
But this is Episode 1, so by way of introduction:
We all know that most women can’t smell past their own cunt, so it should come as no surprise that this sample Cliterati delegation internalized a post written to beta males during UMan’s Shame the Beta Month. They clearly cannot discern the difference between my love for sluts, and my warning to men who would lower themselves by committing to sluts.
I love sex. I love sluts. I fully support women allowing me to use their bodies as my own semi-private playground, and I love them even more when they go on Facebook and defend my right to do so.
Thanks, ladies! Men like me count on you to be there to give up the free booty. Without your eager willingness to slut it up – and your amazing ability to justify it – guys like me would have to offer love and commitment to get laid. But I understand your position on defending sluttery, because if men had to commit to get laid, your used up hit-the-wall-10-years-ago ass would never get any play.
Anyhoo, on to the main attraction.
Hamster 1: Wow… that judgmental piece of bullshit makes me very sad… for lots of reasons and on lots of levels. And that is really ALL I have to say on it.
Score! Shaming language before the end of the first sentence of the first response. And as you might expect, that’s far from “ALL” she has to say about it.
Hamster 1: He’s not someone from the gene pool I’d choose to father my child, let’s just say that.
Well, that sucks. I’ve been hoping for a chunky middleaged hag to sponsor.
Hamster 2: Okay, so that’s kind of a harsh opinion and a bit offended for having being called a whore, but okay, I don’t even know the guy. Seems naive to me that there’s a direct correlation between having more than one sexual partner in a lifetime and the ability to be a good mother. I think most of us can tell a woman who is of good character and one that isn’t, and sleeping with multiple people is low on the list that proves poor character.
Classic gender projection. Sleeping with more than one partner doesn’t make a man less likely to be a good father in a woman’s eyes, so she assumes men feel the same way about women. But that’s beside the point, because that’s not what I said in the article. I simply pointed out the type of role model a man would want for his daughter.
Hamster 3: How does he know how many men she has slept with?
I don’t, nor do I care, as long as you open those legs for me. Again, I was warning men not to marry a tramp. No reason to get upset about this, unless you’re a tramp.
Hamster 4: Couldn’t even get through the whole thing because it’s so ridiculous. Bored the hell out of me.
You didn’t read it? That’s ok. I’m sure a smart gal like you still has an opinion though. Please continue.
Hamster 2: Very true, and I know he’s not mine [type of guy] Thanks for sharing, it is interesting to hear what’s on other peoples’ minds.
Hamster 4: No – it didn’t even hit a nerve with me…..BECAUSE I found what he was saying to be nonsense…and yes, ridiculous.
Ridiculous? You said you didn’t read it. Isn’t that kind of like me calling you a slut without really knowing you? Meh. I guess sometimes we can just tell.
Hamster 4: Not my kind of guy either ~ so I’m not even concerned.
Hamster 5: I am just curious as to who was his intended audience….Or does he just send this to his friends?
OP: It’s a blog he writes. Lots of interesting stuff on it. http://theuniversityofman.com
Hamster 4: Never said there aren’t guys that think this way……in the 1950s. lol I’m sure there are plenty who think or talk this way…and they’re not my type. I don’t have harsh standards for men. And I don’t think they’re all bad or undeserving or douchebags, assholes, users, “man-whores”, etc. Not even close.
She’s right. Men did think like that in the 1950’s, and they paid dearly for it by being subjected to loving, faithful wives, good kids, very low divorce rate, etc. The women paid for it too, by not having the “strength” to go into a public forum as a middle aged single shrew and defend all the cock she’d hosted. And the children… oh those poor children who had to come home every day to a two-parent home. Sounds awful.
Hamster 4: No – I just think people married for MUCH different reasons back then. We don’t NEED to get married now. I could be married if I wanted to be. No problem. But I’m only getting married to the “Right” guy for me ~ not out of security. It was different back then.
Want to know what love sounds like? Listen to my grandmother talk about my grandfather who she’s been mourning for over 30 years. Fuck you and your “need” talk. You could be married if you wanted to? So you’re either fucking men below your rank, or you can’t keep the ones you’re really in to after they bust a nut in you for a few months. Either way, you’re a low-quality woman. (Note: The men below her rank probably follow her around pussy-begging, which makes her grossly overestimate her desirability. The guys she’s really wanting won’t commit to her; otherwise, she’d be married.)
Hamster 2: I agree with [Hamster 4], and men growing up now will be used to women having a lot of choices, as opposed to in the 50′s where women had very few choices in life and very few choices in available men–I don’t believe there was a lot of ‘circular dating’ going on.
Slutting it up = choices. Killing babies = choices. The church being forced to pay for thier birth control = choices. Women have such pretty words for the destructive properties of their womb.
Hamster 4: Right ~ bc back then, what made a guy “right” for a woman was if he could take care of her financially ~ protect & provide. I’m GLAD to see women wanting more than that in a relationship! Women DO have choices now….&, personally, I believe this is now the time when men need to step it up & be a modern MAN….a loving man who is capable of a loving relationship. More men are even better father’s these days….more involved with their kids, etc. And some women never get married, who cares?!?! It’s certainly not the end all, be all. People get married…and divorce a lot. Why is that considering “Winning the race?” It’s not in my book. As for nursing homes ~ hell…..women have been left alone in old age for a loonnnng time as many men die well before women.
Translation: We need more kitchen bitches to man up, marry whores, and look after the children. Of course, this isn’t the type of men she’s fucking, or she’d be married – so there’s a certain type of man whose bad behavior she keeps rewarding with vag. What type of man could that be? Oh yeah. Guys like me (20 years older – give me some credit).
Hamster 4: That’s wonderful about your mom & dad, [OP]. There are always exceptions~ back then & now, too. But mannnnnnnnny people back then had rltnshps I wouldn’t want.
I guess she prefers the kind of relationship she has now. I’m guessing she’s single, and throwing casual booty to a guy who “just isn’t ready for a relationship right now.” Christ, I love using that line. Works like a charm on women who only think they have choices.
Hamster 2: That’s so sweet that your parents worked out and her priority as a woman at that era was as [other Hamster] said. She obviously had good sense and intution when it came to your father!
OP’s mother was a virgin when she married her father, yet she still had the skills and intuition to choose a good man. How is this possible? I thought women didn’t have any options back then? I thought women needed to slut it up with lotsa cocka to gain the skills needed to identify a good man? The modern woman memo I recieved said that at an average of 6 inches, women needed at least 17 feet of veiny rod to find a good fit.
Well, that’s all I can stand to read for now. Episode 2 will be coming your way whenever I get around to it.